Data Structures and Algorithms

   

Critical Analysis of the Bennett–Riedel Attack on the Secure Cryptographic Key Distributions Via the Kirchhoff-Law–Johnson-Noise Scheme

Authors: Laszlo B. Kish, Derek Abbott, Claes-Goran Granqvist

Recently, Bennett and Riedel (BR) (http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.7435v1) argued that thermodynamics is not essential in the Kirchhoff-law–Johnson-noise (KLJN) classical physical cryptographic exchange method in an effort to disprove the security of the KLJN scheme. They attempted to demonstrate this by introducing a dissipation-free deterministic key exchange method with two batteries and two switches. In the present paper, we first show that BR’s scheme is unphysical and that some elements of its assumptions violate basic protocols of secure communication. All our analyses are based on a technically-unlimited Eve with infinitely accurate and fast measurements limited only by the laws of physics and statistics. For non-ideal situations and at active (invasive) attacks, the uncertainly principle between measurement duration and statistical errors makes it impossible for Eve to extract the key regardless of the accuracy or speed of her measurements. To show that thermodynamics and noise are essential for the security, we crack the BR system with 100% success via passive attacks, in ten different ways, and demonstrate that the same cracking methods do not function for the KLJN scheme that employs Johnson noise to provide security underpinned by the Second Law of Thermodynamics. We also present a critical analysis of some other claims by BR; for example, we prove that their equations for describing zero security do not apply to the KLJN scheme. Finally we give mathematical security proofs for each BR-attack against the KLJN scheme and conclude that the information theoretic (unconditional) security of the KLJN method has not been successfully challenged.

Comments: 33 Pages. Accepted for publication at PLOS ONE

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2013-06-09 11:36:09
[v2] 2013-06-11 09:43:35
[v3] 2013-06-17 11:43:33
[v4] 2013-06-18 10:49:33
[v5] 2013-06-20 16:53:04
[v6] 2013-06-29 01:10:16
[v7] 2013-07-02 02:11:52
[v8] 2013-08-10 22:03:20
[v9] 2013-09-08 16:02:35
[vA] 2013-10-14 10:27:03
[vB] 2013-10-20 14:40:22

Unique-IP document downloads: 879 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus