Set Theory and Logic

   

What Gödel's Theorem Really Proves

Authors: Antonio Leon

It is proved in this paper the undecidable formula involved in Gödel's first incompleteness theorem would be inconsistent if the formal system where it is defined were complete. So, before proving the formula is undecidable it is necessary to assume the system is not complete in order to ensure the formula is not inconsistent. Consequently, Gödel proof does not prove the formal system is incomplete but that, once assumed it is incomplete, it is possible to define an undecidable formula within the system. This conclusion makes Gödel's incompleteness theorems devoid of substance.

Comments: 14 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2014-01-22 05:43:50

Unique-IP document downloads: 165 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus