Authors: David Brown
In a 2007 publication Lestone suggested that at the Planck scale there might be a model of the electron consisting of 3 vibrating strings confined to a 2-sphere. Lestone’s heuristic string theory suggests that, at the Planck scale, among the fundamental particles of the Standard Model massive bosons might be 1-spheres, leptons might be 2-spheres, and quarks might be 3-spheres. I have conjectured that the Koide formula and Lestone’s heuristic string theory are essential for understanding the foundations of physics. I have also conjectured that contrived brane interactions can allow string theory and eternal cosmological inflation to explain any plausible or implausible physics. String theory with the infinite nature hypothesis might imply the string landscape, superpartners, and eternal cosmological inflation. String theory with the finite nature hypothesis might imply that the multiverse has a big bang that recurs every 81.6 ± 1.7 billion years, that the Fernández-Rañada-Milgrom effect is empirically valid, and that the inflaton field emits electromagnetic radiation according to the Space Roar Profile Prediction. From the data for the Lambda-CDM model, for the total observed mass-energy, the fraction of dark energy is .728±.016. String theory with the finite nature hypothesis might explain why (1 – .728)/.728 is approximately 3/8 (= 27/72). In this brief communication there is a discussion of the compatibility of Lestone’s heuristic string theory with eternal cosmological inflation.
Comments: 6 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2014-04-12 12:10:40
Unique-IP document downloads: 140 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.