Authors: G. H. Mickey Thompson
Big bang evidence is overwhelming and most scientists agree our region of space contains matter that began to expand from a small point some 13.8 billion years ago. Yet, the accepted Inflation model has encountered several misfit anomalies and to accommodate them its proponents have had to invent some dubious new physics. It’s becoming increasingly clear, however, even to adherents of that model, that their magical physics can’t predict anything and therefore leaves nothing they can legitimately call a theory. We now have a groundswell of researchers who are openly rebelling, but cannot overcome the ivory tower fortress defended by those vested in the current model. This paper focuses on anomalies challenging that Standard model. When analyzed as a set, their analysis yields insights for developing a model that more closely matches the data. This alternative model sets aside the unproven physics the current model requires in order to deal with its problems. It’s based on the assertion that dark energy; matter/antimatter disparity; microwave background texture; early genesis of stars and galaxies; and anthropic conditions are a coherent body of evidence that suggests the big bang did not occur in an empty void, but took place in a much older and larger universe. While some details of this model may not pass muster, its fresh perspectives expose new avenues of exploration and shows how Einstein’s universe—having only three spatial dimensions and one time dimension—can easily accommodate every phenomenon we observe, with no need for supernatural dimensions, warp-speed inflation, or mysterious vacuum energies. Keywords: Anthropic conditions, antimatter disparity, Big Bash model, dark energy, dark matter, Electric Universe, gravity, magnetohydrodynamics, quantum mechanics, radioactive decay, singularities, Z-Pinch
Comments: 18 Pages.
Download: PDF
[v1] 2014-05-15 23:40:35
[v2] 2014-06-07 22:42:20
[v3] 2014-07-24 23:18:42
Unique-IP document downloads: 202 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.