History and Philosophy of Physics


A Zero-Point Energy Inclusive Principle of Conservation of Energy Consistent with Zero Net Energy in the Universe

Authors: Ray Fleming

The common statement of the principle of conservation of energy fails to take into account the energy of the vacuum, the zero-point energy. What happens for example when a body of matter displaces the local vacuum and reduces the local zero-point energy? In a prior paper the author determined that the mass-energy of electron and proton is equivalent to the zero-point energy they displace.1 This opens up the intriguing possibility that the principle of conservation of energy should be restated, the total amount of energy including zero-point energy is constant. This paper will include investigations of how different forms of energy can be seen as a displacement of zero-point energy thus confirming the modified principle of conservation of energy. This principle of conservation of energy can also be stated as; the net energy of space is always zero after the baseline zero-point energy is subtracted. In terms of classical forms of energy, there is no net energy in the universe. That leads to the interesting observation that there is no energy beyond the ever-present zero-point energy and thus no problem with regard to the origin of energy.

Comments: 6 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2014-10-12 11:37:20

Unique-IP document downloads: 215 times

Articles available on viXra.org are pre-prints that may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should therefore be treated as preliminary and speculative. Nothing stated should be treated as sound unless confirmed and endorsed by a concensus of independent qualified experts. In particular anything that appears to include financial or legal information or proposed medical treatments should not be taken as such. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus