Authors: Leo Vuyk
Benjamin Libet measured two different electric Readiness Potentials time profiles called RPI and RPII. to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his students related to the Time of Conscious Awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come about 400 m.sec behind the RP I or RPII. All “volitional acts” were in principle based on the free choice to press an electric switch button. The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected idea of free will and causality. However I woud propose the seemingly absurd but constructive possibility that we are not alone for decision making if we live inside a Charge/Parity (CP) symmetric multiverse as one part of a CP symmetric set of persons. Even Max Tegmark suggested already about the multiverse: “Is there a copy of you reading this article?” In line with Max Tegmark, my proposal is, that we could be long distance entangled with at least one instant entangled anti-copy person living inside a Charge and Parity symmetric anti-material copy Universe. In that case we could construct a causal explanation for Libet’s strange results between RPI and RPII, because new statistical difference research on RPI and RPII of extended Libet experiments described here could give answer on the number of participating copy persons living inside the same number of copy universes.
Comments: 8 Pages.
[v1] 2017-04-01 09:19:43
Unique-IP document downloads: 14 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.