Quantum Physics

   

Bohmian Double Slit Interpretation by Dual Entangled Universes, and the Benjamin Libet Experiment.

Authors: Leo Vuyk

Benjamin Libet measured the so called electric Readiness Potential (RP) time to perform a volitional act, in the brains of his students and the time of conscious awareness (TCA) of that act, which appeared to come 500 m.sec behind the RP. The results of this experiment gives still an ongoing debate in the broad layers of the scientific community, because the results are still (also in recent experiments) in firm contrast with the expected idea of Free Will and causality. Comparable debates are also related to the Broglie-Bohm interpretation of Quantum Mechanics also called Bohmian Mechanics, focussed on the so called single photon double slit interference experiment. I would try to answer those questions by postulating the absurd but constructive possibility that both slits are wavefunction connected and secondly even I myself is wavefunction entangled for decision making in a CP symmetric multiverse. Even Max Tegmark suggested already about the multiverse: “Is there a copy of you reading this article?” We (and all particles and wave information) could be instant entangled with at least one instant entangled anti-copy person living inside a Charge and Parity symmetric copy Universe. In that case we could construct a causal explanation for Libet’s strange results. New statistical difference research on RPI and RPII of repeated Libet experiments described here could support these ideas.

Comments: 17 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-04-05 03:46:24

Unique-IP document downloads: 20 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus