General Science and Philosophy


4 Science Letters

Authors: Rodney Bartlett

These letters cannot, I've discovered, be published in science or medical journals. In the first case, they don't conform to editorial standards which say they aren't suitable for the Correspondence (Letter to Editor) section. In the second case, the relevant letter (3) is not based on "evidence-based medicine" (ideas limited to verification by present technology). So it appears that the only way to express these thoughts is to be nonconformist, give science higher priority than editorial matters, and offer them to the preprint The 4 letters are: Letter 1 - Broken Infinity (paragraphs kept getting added to this original letter, so some references are included in the letter while some are listed at the end) Letter 2 - "Unscientific" Possibilities Of A Universal Unified Theory Letter 3 - Science's Resurrected Immortals Letter 4 - New Space-time Travel

Comments: 6 Pages. Previous versions unsuccessfully submitted to Nature, New Space, Medical Journal of Australia

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2017-07-02 03:15:58

Unique-IP document downloads: 36 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus