Authors: Alexandre Harvey-Tremblay
Suppose for a moment that physicists discovered the formulation of the ultimate theory of everything (ToE) which explains all physical phenomenas. This is a remarkable achievement no doubt. But, what is to stop someone from asking; “Why this theory and not another?”. In other words, can it prove its own uniqueness? Surely this question will be asked. Some, like myself, would consider this question to be one of the most philosophically important questions of the theory. So, what requirements must an eventual ToE have to be able to provide an answer to this very question?
Comments: 13 Pages.
[v1] 2017-10-30 18:44:15
Unique-IP document downloads: 59 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.