Authors: Colin James III
For "Why there is something rather than nothing", we rewrite as "Nothing implies something". (1) For "Why there is anything rather than nothing", we rewrite as "Nothing implies anything". (2) The difference from (1) to (2) is in the modal or quantified operator in the consequent going from possibility to necessity or from one/some to all. Both expressions (1) and (2) are tautologous and theorems. This means nothing implies anything, but anything does not imply nothing. Hence the metaphysical problem is answered.
Comments: 1 Page. © Copyright 2018 by Colin James III All rights reserved. firstname.lastname@example.org
[v1] 2018-05-13 07:29:01
Unique-IP document downloads: 15 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.