The Corrections of Pressure And Mass Limit of The White Dwarf Star

Authors: Ting-Hang Pei

Traditional explanation for the white dwarf star is based on the ideally degenerate Fermi electron gas to produce the pressure against gravity. This theory predicts the upper mass limit of the white dwarf star is 1.44 Mʘ although the Fermi electron gas is calculated at the temperature T of absolute zero. In this research, first considering the electron-electron interaction in the high-density Fermi electron gas at T=0 K, this interaction causes the pressure 2/137 time less than the original value. However, the pressure of the Fermi electron gas should have something to do with temperature at 10^7 K. Then we estimate the temperature effect using statistical mechanics and find the total pressure depends on temperature weakly at the given particle number N and volume V. According to this, the relationship between radius and mass of the white dwarf star is obtained and it mainly depends on temperature, electron mass, and proton mass. An unknown parameter δ=34.75 is calculated by using an example of a white dwarf star with the mass of our sun and the radius of Earth. This relationship is useful for estimating the inner temperature of a white dwarf star. The lowest limit of M/R^3 depends on neutron mass, electron mass, and temperature.

Comments: 9 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2018-07-16 07:34:37
[v2] 2018-07-17 00:34:34
[v3] 2018-07-20 10:52:10
[v4] 2018-07-23 00:24:02
[v5] 2018-07-24 01:15:10

Unique-IP document downloads: 20 times is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus