Authors: Colin James III
We evaluate the logic system PŁ4 as refuting and replacing VŁ4. Seven modal theses and four axioms are not tautologous and contrary to those of PŁ4. This denies that PŁ4 refutes VŁ4, refutes PŁ4, and justifies VŁ4 as containing the non bivalent fragment named PŁ4.
Comments: 2 Pages. © Copyright 2019 by Colin James III All rights reserved. Respond to author by email only: info@cec-services dot com. See updated abstract at ersatz-systems.com. (We warn troll Mikko at Disqus to read the article four times before hormonal typing.)
[v1] 2019-02-07 18:52:35
Unique-IP document downloads: 0 times
Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.
Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.