Number Theory

   

Proof of Lagarias’s Elementary Version of the Riemann Hypothesis

Authors: Stephen Marshall

The Riemann Hypothesis is one of the most important unresolved problems in Number Theory, it was first proposed by Bernhard Riemann, in 1859. For 160 years mathematicians have struggled with this problem to no avail. The difficulty of the Riemann Hypothesis is the main reason the hypothesis has remained unsolved. Although the Riemann Hypothesis remains unsolved, several mathematicians have proven other problems are the equivalent of the Riemann Hypothesis. In other words, if any of these equivalent criteria were solved, it would also solve the Riemann Hypothesis. Of particular interest to the author is a very elementary equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis, Lagarias’s Elementary Version of the Riemann Hypothesis. In 2002, Jeffrey Lagarias proved that his problem is equivalent to the Riemann Hypothesis, a famous question about the complex roots of the Riemann zeta function. The beauty of the Lagarias’s Elementary Version of the Riemann Hypothesis, is that it is truly an elementary and very simple problem compared to the Riemann Hypothesis. The simplicity of Lagarias’s proof is what attracted the author to attempt to solve the Riemann Hypothesis. The author was very surprised at the simple proof he formulated using the elementary work of Lagarias. The moral of this story is that many times elementary or simple proofs exist to complex mathematical problems, this is one of those cases.

Comments: 9 Pages.

Download: PDF

Submission history

[v1] 2019-04-03 09:55:42
[v2] 2019-08-09 13:48:13

Unique-IP document downloads: 28 times

Vixra.org is a pre-print repository rather than a journal. Articles hosted may not yet have been verified by peer-review and should be treated as preliminary. In particular, anything that appears to include financial or legal advice or proposed medical treatments should be treated with due caution. Vixra.org will not be responsible for any consequences of actions that result from any form of use of any documents on this website.

Add your own feedback and questions here:
You are equally welcome to be positive or negative about any paper but please be polite. If you are being critical you must mention at least one specific error, otherwise your comment will be deleted as unhelpful.

comments powered by Disqus