[7] **viXra:1012.0044 [pdf]**
*submitted on 22 Dec 2010*

**Authors:** Jose Alverez Lopez

**Comments:** 23 pages.

The Lorenatzian "contraction" for length, time, mass and
temperature - taken as functions of a dimensional equation
- enable the author to define the mathematical structure
of the constants of nature. In this way the a priori
determinaation of all the constants of nature has been
rendered possible

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[6] **viXra:1012.0038 [pdf]**
*submitted on 17 Dec 2010*

**Authors:** Boris Hikin

**Comments:** 9 pages

It is shown that writing the metric tensor in dimensionfull form is mathematically more
appropriate and allows a simple interpretation of the gravitational constant as an emergent
parameter. It is also shown that the value of the gravitational constant is due to the
contribution of all the particles in the Universe. Newton's law of gravitation is derived from
atomic considerations only. The Dirac's large number is related to the number of particles
in the Universe.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[5] **viXra:1012.0037 [pdf]**
*submitted on 15 Dec 2010*

**Authors:** Peter Sujak

**Comments:** 5 pages

In this paper the inconsistency of contemporary quantities of energy and momentum in QM,
TR and CF are demonstrated .To correlate these quantities inevitability of installation rest
momentum po and total momentum
pt according to TR rest and total energy concept is required. It is explained that: (see paper)

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[4] **viXra:1012.0030 [pdf]**
*submitted on 14 Dec 2010*

**Authors:** Noel Eberz

**Comments:** 6 pages

While entitled ‘differently’ is a big order, it is not so much refutation but alternative views
essentially ‘decoded’ from the multiple disciplines of general science. These four concise
assertions can find correlation with both the fine and large scale structure of the universe:
Time as only Now,
Mass as the confinement of Energy,
Defining a base energy form – Optical Gre theory,
Interpreting an electromagnetic Space fabric.
In concert these ideas are interpreted in three parts:
Why Mass & Energy are different or are they?
Justifying an Electromagnetic Space fabric
Originality in decoding Complexity.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[3] **viXra:1012.0018 [pdf]**
*submitted on 7 Dec 2010*

**Authors:** Stephen J. Crothers

**Comments:** 6 pages

The general solution to Einstein’s vacuum field equations for the point-mass in all
its configurations must be determined in such a way as to provide a means by which
an infinite sequence of particular solutions can be readily constructed. It is from
such a solution that the underlying geometry of Einstein’s universe can be rightly
explored. I report here on the determination of the general solution and its consequences
for the theoretical basis of relativistic degeneracy, i. e. gravitational collapse and the
black hole.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[2] **viXra:1012.0015 [pdf]**
*submitted on 4 Dec 2010*

**Authors:** John A. Gowan

**Comments:** 28 pages

This table may be read like an English paragraph. Row one recapitulates the the creation of matter in the
"Big Bang". The universe begins with light, free electromagnetic energy - a perfectly symmetric form of
energy. The role of gravity at this stage is to provide sufficient negative energy to counterbalance the
positive energy of the "Creation Event", such that the cosmos is born from a state of zero net energy and
charge. The intrinsic motion of light (which is the entropy drive of light) creates space, the expanding and
cooling entropy/conservation domain of free energy. The interaction of high-energy light with the metric
structure of spacetime creates virtual particle-antiparticle pairs of primordial leptoquarks (leptoquarks are
primordial leptons broken into three subunits, the quarks). (See: "The Particle Table".) Symmetry is
maintained so long as there are equal numbers of particles vs antiparticles. Row one ends with symmetrybreaking
of the primordial leptoquark pairs and the production of single (matter) baryons and leptons by the
action of the Higgs boson and the weak force Intermediate Vector Bosons (IVBs). (See: "Table of the Higgs
Cascade".) (Although leptoquark particle-antiparticle pairs are produced in equal numbers, electrically
neutral antimatter leptoquarks apparently decay at a slightly faster rate than their matter counterparts.) The
sub-elementary quarks carry fractional charges necessary to the production of electrically neutral
leptoquarks, allowing the neutrals to live long enough to undergo asymmetric weak force decays. These
decays should also produce leptoquark neutrinos, which are "dark matter" candidates. (See: "The Origin of
Matter and Information".)

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology

[1] **viXra:1012.0006 [pdf]**
*replaced on 11 Jan 2011*

**Authors:** J Kokošar

**Comments:** 11 pages

The main argument against the relativistic mass is that it does not tell us
anything more than the total energy tells us, although it is not incorrect. It is shown
that this is not true, because new aspects of special relativity (SR) can be noticed. One
reason for this denition is to show a relation between time dilation and relativistic
mass. This relation can be further used to present a connection between space-time
and matter more clearly, and to show that space-time does not exist without matter.
This means a simpler presentation than is shown with Einstein's general covariance.
Therefore, this opposes that SR is only a theory of space-time geometry. Phenomenon
of increasing of relativistic mass with speed can be used for a gradual transition from
Newtonian mechanics to SR. The postulates, which are used for the denition of SR,
are therefore still clearer and the total derivation of the Lorentz transformation is
clearer. Such derivation also gives a more realistic example for the debate regarding
Du's claims. It gives also some counter-arguments for some details of debate about
physical nonexistence of dimensionful units and quantities. These details are why
three elementary units exist and why a direct physical measurement is not the only
possibility for physical existence. Such derivation thus shows that relativistic mass is
dierently presented to us as relativistic energy.

**Category:** Relativity and Cosmology